When do I need Vdirsyncer?

Why not Dropbox + todo.txt?

Projects like todo.txt criticize the complexity of modern productivity apps, and that rightfully. So they set out to create a new, super-simple, human-readable format, such that vim suffices for viewing the raw data. However, when they’re faced with the question how to synchronize that data across multiple devices, they seemed to have reached the dead end with their novel idea: “Let’s just use Dropbox”.

What does file sync software do if both files have changed since the last sync? The answer is to ignore the question, just sync as often as possible, and hope for the best. Because if it comes to a sync conflict, most sync services are not daring to merge files, and create two copies on each computer instead. Merging the two task lists is left to the user.

A better idea would’ve been to use git to synchronize the todo.txt file, which is at least able to resolve some basic conflicts.

Why not file sync (Dropbox, git, ...) + vdir?

Since vdirs are just a bunch of files, it is obvious to try file synchronization for synchronizing your data between multiple computers, such as:

The disadvantages of those solutions largely depend on the exact file sync program chosen:

  • Like with todo.txt, Dropbox and friends are obviously agnostic/unaware of the files’ contents. If a file has changed on both sides, Dropbox just copies both versions to both sides.

    This is a good idea if the user is directly interfacing with the file system and is able to resolve conflicts themselves. Here it might lead to erroneous behavior with e.g. khal, since there are now two events with the same UID.

    This point doesn’t apply to git: It has very good merging capabilities, better than what vdirsyncer currently has.

  • Such a setup doesn’t work at all with smartphones. Vdirsyncer, on the other hand, synchronizes with CardDAV/CalDAV servers, which can be accessed with e.g. DAVDroid or the apps by dmfs.